-Austere
-Floral
-Lovely, bright flavors, crisp apple; nice finish
-Delightful; crisp; toasty.
-Floral, yeasty.
-Herbal nose; a bit of citrus.
-Very fruity.
-Robust bubbles; hints of pear.
-Smooth, more body than others. Slight amber color.
Back To Top
-Delicious ripe cherry flavor; smooth finish (Gus).
-Nice - Like a clean Cotes du Rhone.
-A good syrah-type blend.
-Promising, but young.
-Excellent, but really needs years of aging.
-Outstanding - more drinkable than Tapteil.
-Better than Tapteil.
-Enjoy this better than #2.
-Big, earthy flavors, good tannin. (Gus).
-Nice, will not need age. Dark & extracted.
-Really wonderful, jammy, great tannins. (Gus)
-Terrific. Not fond of reds normally, but this may change my mind!
-Has clearly improved with age - best nose of all. Really nice wine.
-Better & better as it opened - really good!
-smooth, you can really taste the effect of age.
-May be the least of the Bordeaux blends but still a nice wine.
-Seems a bit closed in and needs a few years.
-Agreed - has the makings of a very good wine, but not there yet.
-Very good, especially for a 2002. Will certainly benefit from Aging.
Back To Top
-Astringent, but not unpleasant. May open up and mellow. Very thin.
-Floral nose, a bit thin, nice finish.
-Light tannins.
-On the dry side.
-Light on palate, dry finish.
-Light.
-Kinda like #2.
-Bright cherry flavor, good tannins, tart finish.
-Barn yard aroma.
-Fuller than the others, fruitier.
-Yummy fruit and mellow tannins.
-Not a lot of friut.
-Great nose.
-Coffee.
-Fruity; light tannins; nice finish.
Back To Top
-Spicy and flavorful at first, but not a lot of taste at the
end. Makes me think of sipping beer on the beach. J
-Nice floral nose, crisp on the palate, light finish.
-Matches very well with blue cheese
-Bitter flavor, then a long lingering finish.
-Very earthy taste, has the bitterness and spice at the end that #1 lacked
-Very bitter finish and little too carbonated
-Great floral nose. Reminds me of crisp
juicy apple.
-My favorite so far
-Well rounded, fruity flavor. Great aroma
-Good flavor. Very easy on the palate.
-Too hoppy for my taste
-Great flavor. This tripel packs a
wallop.
-Very good. Tasted kind of like a Duvel to me.
-OK, folks are saying it is over hopped. I notice a sweet flavor, perhaps molasses or caramel.
-Tastes like a manhattan! This is fabulous.
-My favorite, very smooth and yummy – Alpa
-Like a spicy applesauce. - Rob
-Sweet Tarts! Yummy!
-Cough medicine, only drinkable with dark chocolate raisins
Back To Top
-Floral, crisp apple, nice tart, finish.
-Light, good fruit, strawberry flavor.
-Definitely cabernet-like...which it should be.
-Cherry flavor.
-Nice cabernet nose.
-Could be more substantial for the price.
-Hmmm...dry.
-Good pucker factor.
-Great stuff, chocolate & black cherry, but needs years for tannin to
recede. Dark & concentrated.
-Seems earthy-ish...may be the food compliment too.
-Favorite!
-Like a good Bordeaux.
-Similar to the Fontalloro but less Bordeaux-like & a little thinner. Still tannic.
-Good fruit; tart finish. (Gus)
-Fruity!
-Really smooth - I like it (Christy)
-A bit of leather, a bit a sparkle, still very young.
-Earthy - like a Pinot.
-Great fruit, super tannins (Gus)
-Love it.
-Nice, smooth (Christy)
-My fav (Alpa)
-Very, very smooth.
-Good tannins, smooth finish (Gus)
-Very good, maybe best of the tasting.
-Beautiful, tobacco & licorice.
-Really nice.
Back To Top
-Hearty; plum flavor.
-Immediately drinkable.
-Lots of texture.
-A bit leathery.
-Rank #3.
-Tart on first tasting.
-Thin.
-Lighter than #1, but very good.
-Light, sweeter, refreshing.
-Thin for a Rhone.
-Tannic.
-A bit light, but OK
-Fruit and big spice.
-Second that.
-More fruit.
-Watery.
-Thin and weak.
-Rank last.
-Fizzy.
-Rich, bold, my favorite.
-Rank #4.
-Rank #2.
-Corked? No fruit.
-Rank #1.
Back To Top
-Good Fruit (Gus)
-Round, spicy; bang for buck winner.
-Good nose, good fruit (Gus)
-Good balance, fruit.
-Intense fruit, tart finish (Gus)
-Smooth, good tannins (Gus)
-Well balanced. Good red meat wine but that's redundant.
-Cherry flavor, tart finish (Gus)
-Opened up well; great with the grilled meat. (Gus)
-Has some foxy new world character.
Back To Top
-Good fruit, great nose (Gus)
-Better after it opened up.
-Chocolate on the nose, little bit of green pepper, smoky with raspberry jam.
-Intense fruit, great finish (Gus)
-Rich, fruity, excellent finish.
-Fruity & structure = best of WA Syrah.
-Deep dark ruby, lots of pepper
-Has some metallic taste; better later.
-Best of the night, smoky, dense, rich. Fuzzy around the edges.
-Not quite worth the price.
-Great match with the cinnamon/cardamom green olives. I think most of these wines match with cinnamon.
-Almost chocolate.
-OK
(Not Washington State; but 100% Syrah)
-Very earthy, even after being open for a while.
-Earthy structure. Holds up to food. Interesting.
Back To Top
-Peppery (could be the cheese). really good on second taste. Smooth, full, great finish. (Gus)
-Exquisite berry aroma, lovely balance. Ditto above.
-Fruit.
-Lovely, lighter than the others.
-Very good, held up well, tannic.
-Very smooth. (Gus)
-Earthy, herbacious.
-Still a bit of a goaty aroma on the second taste, but much less than on opening. Full flavor, piquant.
-A little stinky on the nose and a little acidic, but also mellow and smooth.
-Cherries...black succulent cherries.
-One of the best and the best nose...needs some time.
-Tart, nice finish. (Gus)
-Full, good tannins. (Gus)
-My oh my - musky aroma on opening.
-Good, one of the best 2 or 3.
-Smooth, velvety.
-Moderate herbiness, but good nose and nice full body.
Back To Top